Volume 6, Issue 3, September 2018, Page: 78-82
The Influence of Additional Surface on Force Platform’s Ground Reaction Force Data During Walking and Running
Shariman Ismadi Ismail, Faculty of Sports Science and Recreation, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia; Faculty of Sports and Health Science, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
Hiroyuki Nunome, Faculty of Sports and Health Science, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
Fatin Farhana Marzuki, Faculty of Sports Science and Recreation, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia
Izzat Su’aidi, Faculty of Sports Science and Recreation, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia
Received: Apr. 2, 2018;       Accepted: Apr. 20, 2018;       Published: May 15, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajss.20180603.12      View  1077      Downloads  54
Abstract
This study compares the vertical ground reaction force exerted from walking and running movement on two different surfaces of a force platform. Five skilled male futsal players were recruited to perform the walking and running tasks over the force platform. In the first setting, the players moved directly in contact with the force platform’s bare surface while in the second setting, the players performed the same tasks on the force platform covered with a typical futsal pitch surface material. The force from the peak heel and peak forefoot strikes were recorded and used for further analysis. A paired t-test was conducted for comparison and the results indicated that there are no significant differences between the two force platform conditions in terms of the magnitude of peak heel strike and peak forefoot strike forces during walking and running. Results also showed that there is a significant difference (p<0.05) on the ratio of the heel and forefoot strike peak force during walking task (1.05 in force platform bare surface, 0.99 in force platform + futsal court surface). While the data obtained in this study suggests that an additional surface on the force plate has no significant effect on the magnitudes of vertical ground reaction force data, there were indeed some changes that occurred on the heel/forefoot strike force ratio in walking task. The result might suggest that an additional surface (futsal court material) on the force platform has some impacts on the movement pattern of the foot during walking task due to the different conditions of the shoe’s outsole-flooring surface interaction.
Keywords
Force Plate, Ground Reaction Force, Futsal Court, Movement Pattern
To cite this article
Shariman Ismadi Ismail, Hiroyuki Nunome, Fatin Farhana Marzuki, Izzat Su’aidi, The Influence of Additional Surface on Force Platform’s Ground Reaction Force Data During Walking and Running, American Journal of Sports Science. Vol. 6, No. 3, 2018, pp. 78-82. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20180603.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Lorini, G., Bossi, D., Specchia, N., 1992. The concept of movement prior to Giovanni Alfonso Borelli, 23.
[2]
Andriacchi, T. P. and Alexander, E. J. (2000). Studies of human locomotion: past, present and future. Journal of Biomechanics, 33, pp. 1217-1224.
[3]
Grillner, S., Halbertsma, J., Nilsson, J. and Thorstensson, A. (1979). The adaptation to speed in human locomotion. Brain Res 165, 177-182.
[4]
Thorstensson, A., Carlson, H., Zomlefer, M. R. and Nilsson, J. (1982). Lumbar back muscle activity in relation to trunk movements during locomotion in man. Acta Physiol Scand 131, 211-214.
[5]
Thorstensson, A., Nilsson, J., Carlson, H. and Zoomlefer, M. (1984). Trunk movements in human locomotion. Acta Ph, ysiol Scand 121, 9-22.
[6]
Nilsson, J., Thorstensson, A. and Halbertsma, J. (1985a). Changes in leg movements and muscle activity with speed of locomotion and mode of progression in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 123, 457-475.
[7]
Ferris, D. P., Louie, M. and Farley, C. T. (1998) Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:989–994.
[8]
Cross, R. (1998). Standing, walking, running and jumping on a force plate. American Association of Physics Teachers, Vol. 67, No. 4.
[9]
Kirtley, C. The origin of ground reaction forces, [On-line]. Clinical Gait Analysis. Available: www.clinicalgaitanalysis.com (Accessed on August 31, 2017).
[10]
Logan, S., Hunter, I., Hopkins, J. T., Feland, J. B. and Parcell, A. C. (2010). Ground reaction force differences between running shoes, racing flats, and distance spikes in runners. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9: 147–153.
[11]
James, S. J., Bates, B. T. and Osternig, L. R. (1978) Injuries to runners. Am. J. Sports Med. 6, 40-50.
[12]
Clement. D. B., Taunton. J. E., Smart, G. W. and Nicol. K. L. (1981) A survey of ovcrusc running injuries. Phys. Sports- med. 9(5), 47-58.
[13]
Bates, B. T., Osternig, L. R., Sawhill, J. A., and Hamill, J. (1983). Identification of critical variables describing ground reaction forces during running. In: H. Matsui and K. Kobayashi (eds.), Biomechanics VIII B, International Series on Biomechanics. Champaign, IL: Human kinetics Publishers, 4B, 635–640.
[14]
Mullineaux, D. R., Milner, C. E., Davis, I. S., and Hamill, J. (2006). Normalization of ground reaction forces. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 22, 230–233.
[15]
J. W. Wannop, J. T. Worobets, D. J. Stefanyshyn. Normalization of ground reaction forces, joint moments and free moments in human locomotion. J Appl Biomech, 28 (2012), pp. 665-676.
[16]
Worsfold P., Smith N., Dyson R. (2007) A comparison of golf shoe designs highlights greater ground reaction forces with shorter irons. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 6, 484-489.
[17]
Ura D, Conway J, Booth J, Carré M. Tennis shoe outsole temperature changes during hard court sliding and their effects on friction behaviour. Proc Eng. 2015; 112: p. 290-295.
[18]
Vieira, M. F., Sacco Ide, C., Nora, F. G., Rosenbaum, D. and Lobo da Costa, P. H. (2015). Footwear and foam surface alter gait initiation of typical subjects. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0135821. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135821
[19]
McGhie, D., and Ettema, G. (2013). Biomechanical analysis of traction at the shoe–surface interface on third-generation artificial turf. Sports Engineering 16(2), 71–80.
[20]
Dolenec, A., Štirn, I., and Strojnik, V. (2015). Activation pattern of lower leg muscles in running on asphalt, gravel and grass. Collegium Antropologicum, 39(Suppl 1), 167–172.
[21]
SI Ismail, H Nunome, FF Marzuki, I Su’aidi. (2018). Measurement of Interaction between Futsal Footwear and Futsal Pitch Surface under Different Outsole Condition. Proceedings 2018, 2(6), 233; doi:10.3390/proceedings2060233
[22]
Diogo C. F. Silva, Rubim Santos, João Paulo Vilas-Boas, Rui Macedo, António Mesquita Montes, and Andreia S. P. Sousa, “Influence of Cleats-Surface Interaction on the Performance and Risk of Injury in Soccer: A Systematic Review,” Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, vol. 2017, Article ID 1305479, 15 pages, 2017. doi:10.1155/2017/1305479
[23]
Thomson, A., Rod Whiteley, R., & Bleakley, C. (2015). Higher shoe-surface interaction is associated with doubling of lower extremity injury risk in football codes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49, 1245–1252.
Browse journals by subject